chief architect home designer suite 2016 vs 2017

Chief architect home designer suite 2016 vs 2017 upgrade#
Chief architect home designer suite 2016 vs 2017 full#
Chief architect home designer suite 2016 vs 2017 pro#
Chief architect home designer suite 2016 vs 2017 software#

If you still have an older version of Chief Architect or Home Designer running on a supported operating system, then you may open these. For details, see the 'Before you Begin' section of the What's New chapter in your software's Help. la# file extensions are no longer supported and cannot be opened by Chief Architect X9, Home Designer 2018, or newer versions.īefore opening any files created in earlier versions of Chief Architect, it is important to be aware of changes made in the newest version and the effect they may have on your legacy files. It was one of the few times that I have had a client who wanted a 'perfect' model so as to have an accurate Materials List ( I really did not know what to expect since a model that is an exact duplicate of how the structure will be built in the field in every detail relative to its foundation Engineering, Framing, electrical, cabinets-I mean everything is quite a horse of a different color from something you whip together for CD's or renderings alone).Files with the older.

Chief architect home designer suite 2016 vs 2017 pro#

I exhaustively checked and double-checked the plan file in both Pro and Chief and got precisely the same results in both (client very happy!). I recently finished a large Apartment complex project where my client has Home Designer Pro and I worked the file in Chief Premiere and the Materials List was vital for this client to use.

What is mainly missing are some of the tools to customize and edit the Materials List but Home Designer Pro and Chief Premiere are quite similar in terms of Materials List abilities, options and tools. HDP has no materials lists or material takeoff abilitiesĪctually all Home Designer titles and versions have the same 'Materials List' tools as does Chief Premiere.

Chief architect home designer suite 2016 vs 2017 full#

Then when funds become available, I can purchase the full CA and be able to bring my files forward with me! One other thing.are there any licensing issues with using the HDP as a professional? I'm not really doing much work, but I have done a couple of projects per year for the last 2 years.Īny help you can provide or enlighten me on would be greatly appreciated. Is what I'm thinking correct? Are icons the same? Layout? I am aware of sheet size limits (18x24 if I remember correctly), what other limitations are there? I have a current client that needs 3D visualization 'on the fly', and I'm thinking this is a good starting point, but just need some input from those in the 'know'.

Chief architect home designer suite 2016 vs 2017 upgrade#

I also feel that the layout and philosophy behind the programs must be similar and therefore not be a waste of my time when we can afford to upgrade to CA. I know that I cannot expect CA results for less than 1/4 the cost, but since budget is a large factor here, what exactly are the limitations of HDP in comparison to CA? I see it's compatible with CA (files can be shared between the programs), and that Chief is offiering upgrade credit, so I'm not sure where I could go wrong? I would really appreciate some some insight on these and any other differences. That peeked my curiosity, and so I did a little research on HDP.

In review of a website, I noticed that Home Designer Pro (HDP) has bi-directional support with Chief Architect. along with pretty good 3D rendering abilities. After a little more in depth review, I have come to appreciate CA for what it is, and man, the potential for saving time. My friend (the contractor) told me about Chief Architect, and my immediate response was, to direct him more towards either Revit or Archicad (my preference), since I had heard very little about CA. If you have any experience with AutoCad, you know my frustrations with drawing things multiple times and changing multiple times to produce drawings. I have a contractor friend whom I've been doing CAD work for, but the ADT 2006 I've used is not cutting the mustard for 3D visualization. Fast forward, I've been mostly out of the industry for the last three years, and moved to Colorado. I'm technically savvy and know what it takes to put a good set of plans together. This was painfully complex and customizable, but it was AutoCAD, so it was 'industry compatible'. for about 17 years, was a CAD Manager at my last office using ADT 2006. So a little about me.was in architecture working for firms in So.

Chief architect home designer suite 2016 vs 2017 software#

I was looking into software purchasing, but need some input from someone who has an in depth knowledge of the products.